Friday, June 24, 2016

Well That’s Gratitude For Ya.

If you find yourself complaining about the hospitality of the country that granted you shelter from whatever real or made-up-for-immigration-purposes threat you happen to be fleeing from then perhaps you’re not a refugee at all.
 
Seriously, if you’re complaining about the food or the accommodations you’re gracious hosts provided you then, yeah, you’re not a refugee.

It’s bad enough close to $1 billion of our tax dollars has been allocated to relocate you to our shores the least you could do is not complain about it.  Canadians are weary enough of refugees already so it’s best not to give us more reasons to be even wearier of refugees as if we need more reasons.

And since I’m talking about it here are more signs you might not be a refugee.





You frequently return to the country of your alleged persecution even as your asylum application is being considered.

You bypass or pass through other countries that can provide shelter to get to one where the benefits are better.


You engage in regular criminal activity in the country where you seek sanctuary.



If even one of these describes you then you’re probable not a refugee but that’s not a problem.  We have an entire industry staffed by people whose livelihoods depend on your patronage and will help you fake it ‘til you make it even though they know you’re phonier than the danger you're purportedly fleeing.  When it comes to making a living they don’t care who you are just as long they get paid.

Sunday, June 19, 2016

Say What!? There's Too Many Refugees In Europe? They Threaten To Alter The Unique Character of the Continent? Germany Should Remain German?

What vile, racist, bigoted, xenophobic, uncaring, and apparent white supremacist said such a thing?

Oh.

Reminds me of the time another man of Asian heritage said some sensible things about immigration sending Canada's virtue-signalling class and careerist political hacks into a frenzy.

They both make sense.

Refuge should be temporary and not a path to permanent settlement.  That's why they're called refugees and not immigrants.  You don't turn the gazebo in a public park into your permanent home just because you sought refuge there from a passing rainstorm.  Allowing refugees to become citizens makes them immigrants which is what we have done here in Canada.  It's why oh so many alleged refugees seek to scam our lax refugee system and why critics label these people as "self selecting immigrants" and not refugees.  They didn't come to Canada to find refuge.  Oftentimes that can be found in their native countries and if not there then in neighbouring states.  No, they've come to Canada because they want to immigrate and then import their families.

Furthermore, not only has the massive influx of migrants into Europe destabilized the EU - a wake up call to open borders proponents and theirs calls for unfettered, unrestricted immigration - it threatens the unique character of Europe and it's member states.  Germany should remain German and not become another Arab majority country.  Allowing this to happen makes the world less diverse and less multicultural and aren't diversity and multiculturalism values we're supposed to be fostering?

Also, the carrying capacity of every country is finite.  Though Canada's landmass is large much of the country is inhospitable to massive human settlement forcing population growth in select pockets of the country which, unfortunately, happen to reside on the nation's richest farming land.  These areas will become overpopulated with the attendant sub-par living standards.  If landmass is all that matters then good news!  There's swaths of cheap land located in north Africa you might be interested in buying.

Wednesday, May 25, 2016

Dear Conservative Party of Canada: Immigrants Don't Vote For You.

I came across this blog post about Canada's erstwhile Minister of Immigration Jason Kenney and learned an interesting fact about the CPC's alleged gains among immigrant voters in the federal election of 2011 where the party secured its majority.

It turns out the seats they won in the nation's urban areas - particularly Toronto which has a high immigrant and non-white electorate - were won not on newly acquired votes from immigrants but on vote splitting between Canada's two left of center parties, the Liberal Party of Canada and the New Democratic Party.  It appears "new Canadians" who supported the LPC in previous elections just shifted their vote to the NDP in 2011.  This allowed the CPC to win those seats where the shift was significant enough to allow them to waltz right up the middle of a split vote.

Looks like immigrants aren't the friends of the CPC after all despite all the efforts made to buy their support with reckless promises of faster, laxer, and more open immigration.  Why should they support the CPC at all when the LPC and the NDP are promising immigrants the same gifts and more if need be?

This is a problem the Conservatives have to acknowledge and it's one they partially brought upon themselves. While the Pierre Trudeau Liberals are often blamed for cynically manipulating the immigration system for party advantage it was Brain Mulroney and the then Progressive Conservative Party of Canada that let the system really get out of control.  Also, when the CPC was in power they imported record numbers of immigrants even in a time of economic downturn thinking they could beat the Liberals at their own game when all they really accomplished was inflate the support base of their political rivals by importing future LPC and NDP voters.  Way to go morons!

The Conservatives need to start acting like conservatives which means adopting a conservative approach to immigration because pandering to the immigrant/ethnic vote bloc doesn't and didn't work.  If they did they would nicely align themselves with the wishes of most Canadians.  Besides, there is something very undemocratic and unnerving that a minority, foreign born portion of the population has so much influence over a policy that can vastly alter the future demographic makeup of the country.  We need a party that listens to the majority, not another one that ignores them to pander to the minority.

Monday, May 9, 2016

Multiculturalism: A Government Policy That Creates Social Problems Where None Before Existed (Only For The Government To Offer Itself as the Solution to The Social Problems It Created).

I’ve come across many attempts to define what multiculturalism is and most of them are wanting but not for a lack of trying.  They seem vague and unsure of themselves.  I find multiculturalism as a concept so ill-defined that I don’t think anyone really knows how to actually describe it without resorting to platitudes and appealing to the broad ideals of mutual respect and tolerance.  That is until I watched this video in which its creator states that diversity just creates social problems where none existed before and I said “That’s it!”  That’s exactly what multiculturalism is.  It’s a government program that only creates problems where there weren’t problems before.

It’s getting tiresome to read and hear comments stating Canada has always been a multicultural country being ignorant of the fact that multiculturalism as social policy was born out of political convenience for the Liberal Party of Canada in the early 1970s.  Prior to that Canada was very confident and comfortable with itself being a country of the British Commonwealth founded by the English and French languages; by European settlers; and rooted in European thought, culture, and traditions.  Everything was going great until some pompous ass came along and f**ked everything up.

Multiculturalism has not contributed anything of significant worth to Canada or to Canadians.  It exists solely as a political tool to manipulate ethnic voting blocs into delivering their votes to a particular political party come election day which was its initial intent all along.  Outside of that all it has done for us is disrupt social cohesion by fragmenting our cities into ethnic enclaves/colonies.  It produces societal headaches by fostering resentment among ethnic groups who seek political power and influence by competing with each other for government largesse.  Because of multiculturalism governmental affairs are now bogged down with identity politics distracting it from addressing more pertinent concerns which it would be doing were it not allowed to distract itself with multicultural non-issues in the first place.  It lets government appear to govern without actually governing.

Multiculturalism is political rent seeking.  It’s the government creating a problem and then offering itself as the solution to the problem it created.  Millions of tax dollars are wasted to fund the new layers of bureaucracy that multiculturalism needs for its administration.  Millions of tax dollars are doled out each year to curry support from ethnic vote banks to fund their organizations, community centers, and festivals which we don’t go to because, frankly, we don’t give a s**t about their culture.  This money could have been put to better use to serve the real needs of Canadians if multiculturalism didn’t exist.

Multiculturalism is a hollow idea.  It’s a non-identity.  It has done nothing for us as a country and denies Canadians the ability to create a unique character and voice on the world stage.  It robs communities of local culture and nations of its character.  It needs to be thrown into the trash can of bad ideas where it belongs.

Tuesday, April 26, 2016

Immigrants to Canada Contribute to Climate Change.

I don’t know about you but it seems Justin Trudeau has spent more time outside the country than in it ever since the Liberals won the federal election back in November of 2015 but I think it’s because Justin is so awesome and it's unfair to the whole of the world if Canadians hog that awesomeness all to themselves.  You see, Justin is so awesome that Canada is too vast, her audience too small to contain and bear witness to the awesomeness that is Justin Trudeau.  Justin knows this so almost immediately after the Liberals won the election that terrible day back in November he embarked on his “Justin Trudeau Is So Awesome” world tour because it would be a crime against humanity to deny the people of the world the opportunity to bask in his awesomeness.  He is after all God’s gift to Canada and Canada’s gift to the world.

That’s why I find it bizarre that he was in New York City recently to lecture the UN on climate change and sign yet another symbolic, non-binding agreement to address it when his globetrotting to date has probably farted out more CO2 emissions into the atmosphere than the bottom 20% of the world’s population does in an entire year.  I mean how serious can you take this guy when he brings along an entourage of 383 souls to the Paris climate summit; more than the U.S., the U.K., and Australia combined; when a smaller contingent of people would have sufficed producing a smaller CO2 footprint and reinforce the image of a government concerned about climate change. 

I don’t believe he gives a damn about climate change.  I think he’s using it as a platform to champion with hopes it will net him a nod from Stockholm.  It also feeds his messiah complex.  It’s all about him really.  Everything, be it the election, gender equality, or climate change.  It’s a means to generate narcissistic supply for the narcissistic Prime Minister and mine adoration from a sycophantic press and a fan base of half-wits.

Were he truly concerned about climate change his party wouldn’t be so determined to shovel more people into the country especially from nations with a lower carbon footprint per capita than Canada.  This is because Canadians have one of the largest carbon footprints in the world.  To put this in perspective, while China is the biggest global producer of CO2 emissions it also has the largest population in the world and broken down per capita Canadians are bigger producers of CO2 emissions than the Chinese.  Yet China is a top source of immigrants to Canada as is India and the Philippines.  Immigrants from these countries, and elsewhere, increase their carbon footprint simply by moving to Canada.

A specific way immigrants contribute to climate change is pushing urban sprawl onto the nation’s arable lands making Canada more dependent on food imports and large agribusiness factory farms both of which have larger carbon footprints than a farm growing local produce.  Furthermore, in urban sprawl the car is king and urban sprawl just expands the urban heat island effect.

Canadians’ large carbon footprint may have to do with the fact that Canada is a northern country with long, cold, dark winters and short hot summers.  It’s a vast country with a relatively sparse population.  To stay warm during the winters, cool in the summers, and to generally traverse its great expanse requires the consumption of inordinate amount of resources.  This may help explain why Canada is warming twice the global rate.  Canada isn’t suitable to hosting a large population.

Whether you accept climate change is real or not is up to you.  However Justin Trudeau has made it very clear it’s very real and very important to him.  When the next election rolls around another one million more people would have been imported into the country increasing their carbon footprint and Canada’s as well.  Allowing that, coupled with his international playboy-esque jet setting, if climate change really matters to Justin Trudeau he has a funny way of showing it.

Tuesday, April 19, 2016

GDP Is A Misleading Metric.

Proponents of mass immigration often point out how immigration contributes positively to increasing the country’s GDP.  While this may be true it doesn’t provide a complete picture because GDP doesn’t measure the overall standard of living or quality of life of a population.

A nation’s GDP can increase while the quality of life of its citizens can stagnate even decline.  For example an individual can work twelve hour days, seven days a week and that will contribute to the GDP but not provide a very favourable lifestyle.  However if this individual decided to take a day off each week for leisurely pursuits then this wouldn’t be recorded in GDP measurements since leisure isn’t measured but that leisure time would improve that individual's quality of life.  And a life of constant work, especially at a job that brings little fulfillment beyond financial need, with no time for leisure is a life not worth living.

Let’s look at the obvious fact that immigrants take up space.  This means they drive up demand for housing.  They also buy and drive cars.  They also get sick and need to see a doctor.  They also need a job to pay for all of this among other things.  All of this contributes to growing the GDP since their demand for goods and services is a measurable activity when calculating GDP numbers.
 
However, by driving up the demand for housing they also drive up the cost of living since the suppliers of housing can increase prices.  This means more disposable income is going to housing instead of meeting other needs.  They drive cars and clog up our already clogged up highways and city streets causing greater commute times and lost productivity to say nothing of the pollution they create.  When they get sick they fill up our emergency rooms and hospitals giving Canada one of the worst wait times in the industrialized world.  None of this is taken into account in measuring the GDP.  As for incomes immigration has had little if any positive effect on income levels and most likely helps to keep real incomes stagnant which means more money is going to pay for your car you drive to your job to make an income to pay for the increasing cost of living.  As for leisure time f**k that!  Who has time for that when you need to work all the time because you don’t make enough money at your job because mass immigration has saturated the job market?  That is if you can find a job that provides an income you can live on.  There are also the negative effects on one’s mental and physical health due to urban sprawl and densification, the loss of green spaces and arable land, effects on social cohesion, and so forth.

GDP is a dubious metric to begin.  To be honest I'm suspect of Canada's GDP numbers since Canadians have to assume record levels of debt to maintain the illusion of prosperity.  But saying mass immigration contributes to positive GDP growth is a disarming tactic because it implies that a growing GDP begets net benefits for the country and therefore the entirety of Canadian society and who can be against that?  But GDP is used to mask the quality of life diminishing problems mass immigration creates.  Indeed, while it’s arguable that immigration has contributed positively to growing Canada’s GDP it can be equally argued, quite persuasively, that it has negatively affected the quality of life for Canadians especially for us who live in the nation’s largest cities.  And since 30%, if not more, of Canada's GDP is composed of real estate and the service sector I'm cynical enough to believe mass immigration is being used to buoy Canada's otherwise weak economy the way China used rampant property development to inflate it's suspect GDP numbers.

Monday, April 11, 2016

#NotSorryKomagataMaru or Will The Sikh Lobby Apologize For The Murder Of W.C. Hopkinson?

Just asking.

And while you're at it how about Air India Flight 182?

Seriously, didn't we do this five years ago?

Not good enough for you?

Now you want another one?

Holy sh*t!  And you wonder why Canadians view you so disfavourably.

I understand you venerate Inspector Hopkinson's killer, Mewa Singh.  See him as a martyr do ya? But the Muslims are the violent ones.  How about that?

It looks like Prime Minister Nincompoop is going to do what Liberals do best and pander to their favourite pet ethnic voting block by apologizing for an event most of us never heard of involving people who are long dead and gone that a previous Conservative government already apologized for to try and beat the Liberals at their own game.

For the uninitiated the so-called Komagata-Maru Incident went down something like this.

An enterprising Sikh in B.C. at the time chartered a Japanese boat and sold passage to Canada to mostly fellow Sikhs back in the Punjab in British controlled India.  They sailed to Canada after departing from Hong Kong and arrived in Vancouver harbour expecting to disembark and bhangra their way right into the country because f**k Canadian sovereignty.  But the Canadian government wouldn't have it and so the Sikhs became restless and acted like violent retards.  After a two month stand-off Canada said "f**k this sh*t" and sent the boat packing with an armed escort into international waters to arrive in India where it's passengers refused to acquiesce to demands by the British to disembark.  And then they proceeded to act like violent retards.  A riot ensued and the British said "f**k this sh*t" and opened fire.  People died.

And it's our fault.

And we're sorry.

We're sorry we didn't let you break our laws and crash our borders because if we did then you wouldn't have acted like violent retards and got some people killed.  Because acting like violent retards is kinda your thing but that's our fault too I guess.  So what I'm trying to say is I'm sorry, I think, because it's our fault, or my fault, or something.

Hey, did anybody see my car?  It's a white Volkswagon Tiguan with plates WHTGLT.  I left it around 124th street and Old Yale Rd in Surrey, B.C.; in the Khalsa School parking lot to be precise.  I left it there to go see a doctor about getting a refill on my medicine.  If anybody finds it you know how to contact me.

Privately Sponsored, Publically Paid For.

There’s much to write about the debacle that is Canada’s response to the Syrian refugee situation and I may get around to publishing a post or two about it but I wouldn’t be writing anything that hasn’t been said in the comments section of the CBC new site or in the commentary of those who share the view that bringing these people here and in such great numbers is a stupid idea.  And referring to a past "success" is no guarantee of a repeated future outcome.  With that said I’m not too sure if I care to write much about the Syrians since it’s the system I want to focus on and the Syrians are just the current benefactors in a long line of past and future benefactors of our most dysfunctional and easily gameable asylum system.

I will say this.  It’s not really Canada’s response in the general sense, as in “we, the people”, but more so the response made by a gaggle of people who occupy influential and privileged positions in the public and private spheres whose inveterate need to virtue-signal compel them to engage in actions that the rest of us will eventually have to pay for in one form or another with no consideration on how we feel about the matter.  From what I gather most of us are sick of hearing about the Syrian refugees and can you blame us?  It’s infuriating to see our political class, from our civic leaders to our national representatives, foot-drag to address more pressing local and national concerns yet can find the time and resources to help foreigners in trouble especially when the cameras are rolling.  Besides, is it really the best idea to bring them here in the first place?  Wouldn’t the resources we’re spending to bring 50,000 Syrians (because the 25,000 the Liberals promised to dump into Canada pre-election didn’t piss us off enough it seems) be better spent and aid more people if it was allocated directly to the refugee camps?  How is bringing in 50,000 Syrians going to positively affect the crisis they are fleeing aside from making a few misguided Canadians feel good about themselves?  It really does lack any rational consideration but that’s par for the course.  We expelled logic and reason from shepherding the nation’s immigration policy a long time ago and replaced them with compassion and political necessity as the guiding lights which is why the system has become such an unmanageable monstrous mess.

In any case, and in the spirit of not repeating what has already been said elsewhere, there’s a write-up at Rebel Media about the true costs of private sponsorship of refugees.  If you haven’t already read it then do so.

A key point to take away from this is that private sponsors are only liable for up to one year for the upkeep of their charge.  After that they become wards of the state if they haven’t become fully self-reliant by then.  The sponsors get all the warm feelings and positive press while we, the public, eventually get the joy of having to pay for it all.

Another key point is that privately sponsored refugees are not wholly supported by their sponsors.  They are entitled to a bevy of publicly funded benefits like dental and health care which their sponsors are not on the hook for.
  
This contradicts the official government line that privately sponsored refugees are not a burden to the public when in fact they are but the government hasn’t been very forthright about its Syrian refugee pet project now has it?  We learned at first that most Syrians didn’t want to come here.  Of those who came to Canada we now know that many weren’t in any immediate danger.  In fact many already had accommodations, renting apartments in Lebanon and Turkey, along with gainful employment.  That being true these Syrians ceased being refugees having found relative refuge.

What’s bothersome about this whole affair is how it was presented to the public as if this was the only viable course of action when alternative options should have been given considerable weight.  Pre-election the Conservative approach appeared to be the most reasonable enjoying healthy public support but our grand-standing left of center parties had to double down on the lunacy and show how out of touch they are with those they want to govern by demanding Canada take an unpopular course of action particularly when that unfortunate boy washed ashore on a Turkish beach.  They capitalized on a terrible event to pander to our emotions so as to present themselves to the public as the compassionate choice and therefore the most fit to govern.  The whole thing reeked of grandiose moral exhibitionism for the sake of obtaining political capital.  And with the election of the Liberals, and thus making a world fame chasing primadonna the national leader (and I use the word "leader" in the loosest sense possible), expect things to get much worse.  So if you’re anything like me you may want to remove all sharp objects from your home.  But if you want to keep them on hand for, you know, "reasons" then remember it’s down the road not across the street.

Sunday, April 3, 2016

So Where Was I?

Apparently I wasn’t having a nightmare after all.  The Liberals really did win the election back in October, 2015 sending a very undeserving and a very vain and vapid man to the PMO.  

I barely slept that night and have slept very little since then only to recently awaken from my first bought of prolonged sleep after knocking myself senseless from one too many facepalms to the head thanks to the one too many times our allegedly objective and dispassionate national media swooned over the cringeworthy statements and deeds of our Tumblr-tier PM.  Like, holy f**k!

As if it couldn’t get any worse a pathetic known drunkard of an ex-banker with a PhD. in crystal ball gazing gets appointed Minister of Immigration in Justin Trudeau’s vote pandering, “It’s [current year]” cabinet of mostly token appointees.  Good God!

So it looks like it’s time to dust off the old blog and pick up from where I left off ‘cause I don’t know how I’m going to handle the next few years without an outlet to blow off some steam.  While I will concentrate on immigration as the main thrust of my writing I may go off topic from time to time to comment on the attention getting, “Look at me everyone” antics of Pierre Trudeau’s spawn as well as the overall pathetic state of Canadian politics and the mediocrities that pollute it.

I hate blogging and I didn’t miss it but it’s only been five months since their election victory and already the Liberals make me want to jump from the heights of the CN Tower after ingesting two cyanide capsules for good measure.  

And they’re just getting started. 

God, it’s going to be a long f**king four years.