Saturday, 14 August 2010

The MV Sun Sea Is Not The S.S. St. Louis (so send them all back).

Comparisons are being made between the MV Sun Sea and the S.S. St. Louis as if the arrival of some 490 illegal Sri Lankan Tamil migrants off the coast of British Columbia mirrors the attempt by some 930 German Jews to find asylum from the growing anti-semitism in 1939 Germany. The comparison is inaccurate as I'll explain.

For starters some things need to be clarified about the history surrounding the S.S. St. Louis.

It is true that Canada did turn away the boat carrying 930 German Jews fleeing rampant anti-semitism in late 1930s Germany but this was after Cuba and the United States had already turned the vessel away. Anti-semitism undoubtedly played a part in the turning back of the S.S. St. Louis by all three nations but so did immigration quotas. You see, the S.S. St. Louis left Germany two months before the outbreak of World War II. Europe, technically, was still at peace and so understandably there was little concern that all aboard the S.S. St. Louis faced death if returned to Europe. And death did not meet those returned, at least not at first. The captain of the ship, Gustav Schroeder, was an anti-Nazi German goy and was determined to see his passengers not returned to Germany. He got is wish. Working with Britain and Europe, U.S. officials were able to find refuge for the passengers. Docking in Antwerp on June 17, 1939 some 288 eventually went to the U.K., 224 went to France, 214 went to Belgium, 181 went to the Netherlands, and the rest remained in Antwerp. So by all accounts at the time the passengers did indeed find refuge albeit a temporary one. Tragedy struck them when war broke out (not Canada's fault) and the countries that offered them refuge fell to Nazi occupation (again not Canada's fault). So to guilt trip Canadians into accepting unreasonable immigration quotas and lax refugee laws by exploiting the history of the S.S. St. Louis is disingenuous.

Be that as it may I do not want to downplay the persecution Jews were experiencing in 1939 Germany. But can a parallel be drawn between 1939 Germany and 2010 Sri Lanka where in place of the Jews we have Tamils? I don't think one can be made at all.

Sri Lanka's Tamils are the second largest ethnic group in the country at 12.6% out of a population of 20 million people. Percentage-wise they are as numerous as blacks are in the United States. They are approximately 1/3 the population of the capital city of Colombo and form the majority in several areas and cities in the north eastern part of the country. The city of Jaffna is one example. Thus, Tamil is an official language of Sri Lanka.

Sri Lanka is a democratic nation. Though the country is Sinhalese majority, minority groups have participated in the nation's democratic process particularly Sri Lanka's Tamils who have been able to exercise political influence through the Tamil National Alliance. This party was formed in 2001 just before national elections through the coalition of four Tamil political parties. Prior to its formation Tamils have exercised their franchise by supporting one of the four Tamil nationalist parties that comprise the Tamil National Alliance Party. These parties are the All Ceylon Tamil Congress, Eelam People's Revolutionary Liberation Front, Tamil Eelam Liberation Organization, and Tamil United Liberation Front. Tamil political participation has been ongoing for some time. The All Ceylon Tamil Congress was founded in 1944 and has been advocating Tamil nationalism ever since. These parties are to Sri Lanka what the Bloc Quebecois is to Canada.

Since Sri Lanka's Tamils and the Sri Lankan government can be accused of obfuscating facts for propaganda purposes so third party testimony becomes all the more relevant. Even this suggests that Sri Lanka's Tamils are exaggerating and fabricating claims of persecution.

Martin Collacott, who was Canada's Canada's high commissioner to Sri Lanka from 1982 to 1986, has this to say:

The suggestion that Tamils are being persecuted as a people in Sri Lanka, however, is nonsense and is a myth propagated by Tamil extremists. The Tigers have, in fact, tried to systematically assassinate moderate leaders in their own community who do not agree with the goal of creating a completely independent Tamil state in Sri Lanka by violent means. The latest victim of their ruthless campaign was the foreign minister of Sri Lanka, Lakshman Kadirgamar, an ethnic Tamil, who was murdered in 2005.

There can be no doubt that Canada has been more than generous to Sri Lankan Tamils seeking asylum. Between 1989 and 2004, for example, we gave refugee status to more than 37,000 such claimants — far more than to the nationals of any other country. Our largesse is also impressive by international standards; in 2003 we accepted 50% more claims from this source than did all the other countries of the world combined.

Here’s one indication of Canadian generosity, and even laxity, in our treatment of refugee claimants. In order to be successful, the claimants have to be able to make the case that they fled their countries of origin because it was not safe to remain there. Yet, in one year alone, 8,600 Sri Lankans with refugee claims pending in Canada applied to the Sri Lankan High Commission in Ottawa for travel documents so they could go back to Sri Lanka for visits.

These are remarks made by a man who was in Sri Lanka at the time when the civil war erupted and when the black July riots of 1983 occurred.

How about the Canadian government? Writting in the same article Martin Collacott notes:
A further indication that Sri Lanka is not quite as dangerous a place for Tamil refugee claimants as their supporters try to make out is to be found in an internal Citizenship and Immigration Canada communication (obtained through an access to information request by Vancouver lawyer Richard Kurland) which noted that “returnees (to Sri Lanka) are dealt with professionally and, unless there are outstanding criminal warrants, deportees and other returnees are simply returned to the community on arrival after brief and professionally conducted interviews.”

The report went on to state that “other countries have successfully returned large numbers of failed asylum seekers, and Sri Lanka is a safe destination for unsuccessful refugee applicants.” In the same vein, at an Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) hearing in 2006, it was pointed out that more than 100 Sri Lankans (failed refugee claimants, and presumably all Tamil) had been sent back to their homeland and none had been mistreated as their lawyers had claimed they would be.

Still not convinced? The National Post quoted James Clad, the former U.S. deputy assistant secretary of defence for South and Southeast Asia in this article as telling the Washington Post:

"I'm not an advocate for sending people back to their deaths, but that is just not happening in Sri Lanka," he said. "I've helped a lot of migrants before, but I know a scam when I see one."

If that is not enough how about the United Nations? According to this Australian Broadcasting Corp. report from July 6:

The report, from the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, describes "greatly improved" security in Sri Lanka, and says it should not be presumed that Tamils need asylum.

Ezra Levant has this to say as well:

But with the war over, life in Sri Lanka has improved — so much so that the United Nations High Commissioner on Refugees says the security situation there is “greatly improved,” and countries of the world should no longer presume someone fleeing Sri Lanka is a genuine refugee.

Question: Why are we pretending these Tamils are refugees, when even the bleeding hearts at the UN don’t?

With the civil war over and the pretense by which many Sri Lankan Tamils used to scam Canada's asylum system gone can we say that Sri Lanka in 2010 is the same as Germany in 1939? Has it ever been? Can we compare the Tamils on the MV Sun Sea to the Jews on the S.S. St. Louis? The answer is no.

If any comparison can be made it is to the S.S. Komogata Maru and as with that ship Canada shouldn't let those aboard land and with naval vessels escort the ship out of Canadian territorial waters. As with those aboard the S.S. Komoagata Maru the Tamils on the MV Sun Sea are attempting to circumvent Canadian immigration law for quick and easy entry into Canada.

They are in fact illegals and should be turned back. It is highly doubtful that the fate that met the Sikhs on the Maru will be the same for the Tamils. But the fate of those on the Maru was brought upon themselves. Called the Budge Budge riot, Sikhs on board the Maru clashed with with police after refusing to re-board the ship since disembarking in Calcutta. They marched upon the city to protest the British colonial government's intention of placing all those aboard the boat on a train to be returned to Punjab. Had there been co-operation instead of belligerence then no one needed to die in the resulting riot. Again, this is not Canada's fault.

But the trip of the S.S. Komogata Maru had been provocative in nature. It was meant to challenge Canada's continuous journey regulation regarding immigration. It was a political statement not an act of innocent immigrants seeking a better life. (As an aside what is oftentimes missing in this narrative is the assassination of William C. Hopkinson by Mewa Singh. Mewa Singh is considered a hero by some Canadian Sikhs and William C. Hopkinson an enemy. So one of the few assassinations of a government official in Canadian history was committed by a Sikh immigrant who is celebrated by other Sikhs who bizarrely call themselves Canadians.) Same can be said of the MV Sun Sea. It is equally a political statement as it is an immigration scam. The awarding of refugee status to Sri Lankan Tamils scores the Sri Lankan Tamil independence movement political points to be used against the Sri Lankan government.

To finish a few things need to be stated. The first is that past events in Canadian immigration history should not be used to dictate present immigration policy. The second is addressing whether those who arrive from Sri Lanka are refugees at all. To much ink and energy is being wasted discussing who and who is not an LTTE terrorist. This is a distraction from the real question: are they refugees at all? I think it has been well demonstrated that those who arrived on the MV Sun Sea are not refugees and should be returned. And I mean all of them. Doing so will ensure that no LTTE terrorist enters Canada who arrived on the MV Sun Sea and it will discourage others from risking their lives on the high seas. This has immigration scam written all over it. Sri Lanka's Tamils have been gaming Canada's refugee system for far too long to let it continue. There are real refugees out there. Let's pay attention to them. Thirdly we shouldn't lose focus of the fact that most refugee claims are made at the nation's airports and border crossings. What happened off the coast of British Columbia happens everyday at those points of entry. This has to do with the Singh decision of 1985 and why the notwithstanding clause needs to be used to revoke it. It has given birth to a costly and inefficient way to determine refugees while undermining Canadian sovereignty. A better way for Canada to meet its commitment to the world's refugees exists.


Anonymous said...

"Too much ink and energy is being wasted discussing who and who is not an LTTE terrorist. This is a distraction from the real question:

Are they refugees at all? I think it has been well demonstrated that those who arrived on the MV Sun Sea are not refugees and should be returned. And I mean all of them.

Doing so will ensure that no LTTE terrorist enters Canada who arrived on the MV Sun Sea and it will discourage others from risking their lives on the high seas.

This has immigration scam written all over it. Sri Lanka's Tamils have been gaming Canada's refugee system for far too long to let it continue."

Too much common sense in that analysis for Ottawa to take into consideration, so they'll likely ignore it.

Would those bureaucrats act any differently if a Sri Lankan flotilla comprised of 10 people-smuggling ships disembarked from that faraway country and headed out to arrive off our British Columbia coast? That could happen next year if this "test case" is successful for them.

And, what of the estimated $22,000,000 in legal fees alone, that will flow into immigration lawyers' pockets in processing this one shipload of not refugees, but un-welcomed invaders?

Twenty-two million dollars dispersed across our country could have housed our entire army of homeless Canadians!

Instead, it's back to their cardboard box under a city bridge for them, while a a shipload of un-invited foreigners, who by right of standing on Canadian soil, are mollycoddled, fed and placed in a warm bed for the night and many nights hereafter at our expense.

And if there are any comparisons to be made with this latest shipload of people crashing our borders (and more to come), I would suggest it's in the framework of the 1973 French novel by Jean Raspail - The Camp of the Saints

A book review is seen HERE.

Anonymous said...

You might want to read this:

Thirai kadal odiyum thiraviam thedu – Tamil proverb. It means, “cross the seas and grab the fortunes”.

See more here:

While the literal meaning should not escape you, there is more to it. It means making a huge sacrifice (cross the sea) and going “all out” if it means seizing absolute victory (grab fortunes). Hence why Tamils for example chose the path of violence and thus wanted to go the whole hog because they knew that victory brings glory, as in a separate state and the race pride that comes with such an outcome, which is why they broke ceasefires and never genuinely attended peace processes -they saw them as time buying exercises in the path of crossing the sea, basically plugging holes in the boat.
Furthermore they believed they could win because they saw Sinhalese as weak and out numbered (unlike for Sinhalese Tamils had the “home base” of Tamil Nadu with 65 million back up), not to mention stupid. They call Sinhalese “modayas” which in Sinhala means “idiot/fool”, they use it to mock Sinhalese as inferiors and have done so since the 1930s.
If you listened to some of their chanting in London and Oslo you could hear them rattling something out in Tamil but in the mix was this phrase “Sinhala modaya”.
They were saying this during the protests: “we will get our homeland, we will get our homeland, rise Tamils rise, rise for Eelam, rise to rinse our land of the Sinhala idiot, the Sinhala idiot can be rinsed, he is no match to us”. This chant also barks out of Tamil radio shows in the West and has done so for the last 20 years. But hey, that’s diversity right?

Coming back to this Thirai kadal odiyum thiraviam thedu, it also explains why Tamil supporters of the LTTE and violence had no problem killing their own, abusing their own, using their own people as human shields, carrying out abductions, using child soldiers –their own Tamil children-, herding their people into the worlds biggest human shield to engineer a humanitarian catastrophe to some how bring foreign intervention to save the LTTE leadership and thus pro-long war in Sri Lanka. So long as the LTTE leadership existed so did the chance for war. All those protests had this goal in mind, they could not give a damn for Tamil deaths, and if the war continued as they hoped, how many more people would die? How many more Tamils would die? It did not matter to them.
They wanted to grab victory somehow, and in 2009, some how survive defeat, they had “crossed the sea” to get the “fortune” but “the fortune” was not their and that was PAINFUL. Worse “the other fortune” (better lives in Western countries through asylum claims) might also come to an end.

Anonymous said...

And the protests began (in huge numbers and “aggressively”) in mid April 2009. Exactly right after the LTTE promised (through the same radio shows + internet sites) they would wipe out two Sri Lanka Army divisions (the 56th and 58th), or at least do enough damage to shock the Army and the nation, then punch through the lines, break out of the hole they got themselves stuck in to and try and make it to the Mullaitivu jungles that were further south. This was a huge operation they planned using resources delivered right to them by the Army itself (food and medial supplies), to give that dose of life the LTTE and the diaspora needed (and prove to the diaspora especially that the LTTE would be alive to somehow continue the fight). Indeed they were close to achieving this goal but by sheer luck Military Intelligence found out they were planning this assault (MI units literally stumbled onto this, they found out what was the last major LTTE operation by complete accident).

The information was relayed to Army command, who tricked them into a trap, boxed them in and pounded the hell out of them. 10,000 LTTE cadres (some were forced conscripts, and that is unfortunate) were wiped out in a matter of hours. Which is also where their numbers for “genocide” come from. You will note they never talk about LTTE causalities, because they lump the two together (and LTTE cadres always dressed as civilians and would magically turn into one on death –do not get conned by their propaganda clippings and ceremonies, on the battlefield they dress like the average joe in a office shirt with bata slippers, it conceals them better during infiltration operations and makes great propaganda when killed).

Why I mentioned food and medical supplies was that the LTTE would always take them (the hospital and schools plus other services in the territory they controlled has through out been, funded, supplied plus staff trained and salaries paid for by the Government of Sri Lanka, and of course USED by the LTTE. They kill us and use the food we send to feed themselves and the medical supplies we provide to heal themselves) and they took huge stock piles for this operation, which was distributed to their fighters to help them survive in the jungles further south. But it all turned to ash with them during this “last hurrah” of theirs in April 2009.

So true to Tamil propaganda the Tamils in the West accused Sri Lanka of denying food and medical supplies to Tamil civilians, when we A) had not B) their freedom fighters had taken it C) they are not the ones even supplying it D) they have not given a loaf of bread to the Tamils in Sri Lanka instead using their bogus charities to buy weapons to keep the war going in Sri Lanka, while the onus of supplying food + medial supplies fell on us –a drop in this service (in the past) usually because they are launching an attack and they Tamils in the West + LTTE are first to scream about it and accuse us of “genocide”.

Mohan Swaminathan said...

Ezra Levant says in his article:

"Let’s do what Australia does. They have a small island 2,600 km off the coast of Perth. It’s actually closer to other countries, like Indonesia.

Australia built an 800-bed holding centre on the island. It’s not a prison, but it’s not a resort either.

When ships full of gatecrashers are caught, they’re steered to Christmas Island, which is not considered Australian soil from an immigration point of view.

They wait there until their refugee claims are processed — and are kicked out if they’re bogus. No living it up in the big city, no disappearing into a 200,000 person diaspora.

Let’s build a Christmas Island. We can do it on one of our remote islands off the West Coast, maybe in the Queen Charlottes.

Food and medicine, immigration officials and CSIS — and no legal rights to anything more, not even to vote for Mr. Malhi."

This is, by far, the BEST solution anyone has offered so far to deal with refugees washed ashore on our lands. Yes, it's going to cost the Canadian taxpayer some to build and maintain an offshore processing centre. But the savings would be in the millions. Let me explain.

The main incentive for (Sri Lankan) refugees wanting to come here is their 300,000 strong diaspora in Toronto. So easy to just melt into this mass of humanity, no questions asked. Deny them this chance, and you'll see, NO MORE REFUGEE SHIPS WILL COME TO OUR SHORES. Ergo, millions of dollars savings in welfare, healthcare, LINC classes, etc etc.

Great solution, Mr Levant. If only our spineless government is listening.

Fed up Sinhalaya said...

When will the demonisation of my people and country stop at the hands of Tamils and you whites for the "crime" of trying to protect ourselves, get back our rights and end the British apartheid which Tamils imported into Sri Lanka by Europeans to crush the Sinhala people with enjoyed. Where under this system of Governance the10% Tamil population (created by Europeans) controls 90% of Parliamentary seats/power these foreigner Tamils held a “privileged status” -where a Tamil is chosen first for EVERYTHING (jobs, education, housing, healthcare, Government placements, services) ahead of non-Tamils, whereby 80% of the population are lowered into third class citizens in their own country. All part and parcel of crushing into submission the native Sinhala Buddhist inhabitants who refused to bow to the West then or now.

After Independence equality was restored, Tamils lost their foreign given control (+ favouritisms, i.e. they now had to WORK for their placements, along with everyone else) and have bitched ever since because they consider themselves superior. To be on an equal platform to those they view as inferior was something they found painful, and well you cannot create an apartheid state democratically –need violence for that.

Read this:

Refugees go home for holidays

OTTAWA - A secret government survey reveals the majority of successful Tamil refugees travel back to Sri Lanka, raising questions about the legitimacy of their refugee status.

To become a refugee, a claimant must prove they are in danger of torture, there is a risk to their life or meet other criteria showing they will face persecution in their home country. Yet this did not stop over 70% of successful Tamil refugee claimants surveyed from returning to Sri Lanka for vacations, business or to sponsor family members.

Zack Baddorf said...

Hi, I'm a freelance reporter doing a story on this issue and would like to talk to you. Please email me at

Anonymous said...

‘ICC Canada Immigration Solutions Inc.’have registered office is 1137 Derry Road East, Mississauga are fraud , we aware from them , they are cheats . they robbed me for $15000 in the name of work permit.
i want to make them aware that .I want to save my fellow countrymen Pakistanis from these CHEATERS


ICC Canada Immigration Solutions Inc SCAMMER ROBERS
if you are also robbed by them pls post the comments here. to save more people from them .

Anonymous said...

ICC immigration are frauds the company runs unethical business practice in canada. Please do not do business with them as their only motive is to dupe their clients in false hopes, while they can do nothing.

All their ICCRC registered agents are criminals including the ownder Ripudiman Dhillon.

Do not give them any money ever. sincere advise to you