Sunday, 10 April 2011

To Contribute To Or Take Advantage Of?

That is the question.

We've all heard it spoken enough that to repeat it invites a gag reflex; that immigrants come to Canada to contribute to it. As noble as this sounds I think this is hardly the case given human nature.

To contribute to implies an act of selflessness as if Canada and Canadians are in desperate need of outside help. I wouldn't describe Canada as a struggling nation nor Canadians as a struggling people so what exactly are we importing people to contribute to? Besides, if selfless contribution is at the heart of every immigrant to Canada then there are plenty on nations around the globe that could use their help more so than Canada. However, I do understand that it is more fulfilling to help a rich person who may also make you rich in the process.

To take advantage of implies a selfish act for personal gain and this to me is the more accurate motive bringing many people to Canada's shores. And I say that not to disparage those who come here but an acknowledgement of the human impulses that compels someone to act one way or another. Self-interest is stronger than altruism.

The linked Vdare article above makes that case. Though it is about the United States it is equally applied to Canada. And though it is about Chinese immigrants the behaviour outlined is not restricted to them.

The motives driving immigrants to Canada is important because it is an indication of what kind of citizens they will be and what Canada really means to them. If Canada is nothing more to them than a shopping mall, a job, an urban sprawl home, and a list of social benefits; health care, education, passport; then the desire to assimilate and be "more Canadian than Canadians" is elusive if at all present. This desire is further hindered by the current state of communications technology and affordable travel which allows one to live a satellite existence in Canada away from the home country. The ever growing foreign presence in Canada, colonies euphemistically referred to as "communities" or "enclaves", let's one live in Canada without actually leaving the homeland.

If contributing to Canada was the real intent then "being Canadian more than Canadians" would be desired but this is no longer the case like it once was. What we experience instead are incessant demands for accommodation which is the demand on the host culture to reshape itself and rethink itself so the introduced one doesn't have to. What we have are so-called "Canadians of convenience", a greater phenomenon than we care to accept.

The way to screen out the opportunists is to make it more difficult for them. This would require rewriting the citizenship laws denying birthright citizenship to anyone born on Canadian territory (or airspace as the case may be) to non-citizen parents. Another would be to rethink dual citizenship. Another would be to make residency requirements tougher, possibly with routine reviews to see if the requirements are being met and a penalty of forfeiture of citizenship if they are not. Another would be to close the loopholes one can exploit to dodge Canadian taxes while drawing an overseas income. These are just a few ideas.

Making it tougher for immigrants to come to Canada and become Canadian citizens would attract those who sincerely desire to come to Canada and repel those who see Canadian citizenship simply as the best deal in town. Something worked for is better appreciated than something not and by making immigrants work for their citizenship will make better citizens of them. Right now, this is something we don't do. Canada is more than just a land of benefits and entitlements.

20 comments:

Anonymous said...

But the real point is that we DO NOT NEED ANY IMMIGRANTS...PERIOD.That's all there is to it. They are being forced upon our people by a very vicious elite that has an agenda totally at odds with the founding people of Canada.

Our birth rates were more than high enough to maintain our productivity. They went down because of the trillions of dollars of anti-White psycho-social engineering that has been forced upon our children.

We need to stop immigration, especially from the third world. If we don't, this country will become a third world country which refects the third world immigrant population.

www.whiterabbitradio.net

PaxCanadiana said...

But the real point is that we DO NOT NEED ANY IMMIGRANTS...PERIOD.

I can't wholly agree with that. There are some benefits to limited and controlled immigration.

They are being forced upon our people by a very vicious elite that has an agenda totally at odds with the founding people of Canada.

I do agree with that. To me it's the liberal/progressive interpretation of "white man's burden" with a hint of Marxist ideas of a ruling elite.

Our birth rates were more than high enough to maintain our productivity. They went down because of the trillions of dollars of anti-White psycho-social engineering that has been forced upon our children.

It's not necessarily anti-white. Japan and Korea have the lowest birth rates in the world. But there was a social re-engineering campaign that had consequences on the birth rate.

We need to stop immigration, especially from the third world. If we don't, this country will become a third world country which refects the third world immigrant population.

I don't wholly disagree with that. I think a future Canada will look like Brazil, a future Jared Taylor prescribed for the United States. Indeed, some parts of the U.S. look like parts of the third world already.

Anonymous said...

PaxCanadiana:

What are the benefits of this controlled immigration that we couldn't achieve by being left alone?

I understand you point about Japan and Korea, however, the reasons for our reduction in birth rates was indeed a calculated attempt to reduce WHITE birth rates. That is my point. The reasons for the lower birth rates in parts of Asia are not important for understanding our situation here. When I say it originated with and anti-White mindset and sentiment, I'm not talking about a non-White origin here; I'm talking about White anglo-elites trying to literally destroy their own founding gene pool. It is unprecedented in history for an elite to do such a thing, but that is exactly what they have tried to do. They look like us White people, but they have no loyalty to us. They have got to go.

Did you say that Canada will look like Brazil? That's unfortunate because Brazil is not static racially or economically. The White population there is decreasing as a percentage of the total population and they suffer outrageous levels of violent crime from non-Whites there. Moreover, their country has given us nothing substantial in terms of progress, innovation, science, or health.
The truth is as plain as the noses on our faces, the browner a country becomes the more retrograde it becomes. It's impossible to avoid that observation. Moreover, the point here is that the founding people of Canada--White people--have not been consulted on this matter. We have not chosen to be transformed into another Brazil, again, this is something that has been forced upon our people by an anti-White genocidal elite and may look like us, but has absolutely not loyalty to us.

These elites want us to become like Brazil because it has lost its White racial character by being blended out of existence. That is what they indended for us, and they have spent trillions of dollars in an attempt to do this in every one of our countries. It was an attempt to force-blend Caucasians right out of existence. That is called GENOCIDE. No matter how it is presented, it is still White genocide.

Anonymous said...

PaxCanadiana:

One of the psychological features of psychological conditioning--better known as brainwashing--is that the victim doesn't realize that he has been psychologically conditioned, that's the point of it. The technicians instill certain mindsets--while eliminating ones they consider undesirable--and do in such a skilled manner that you simply take on the mindset which they want you to. You essentially become an unwitting operative for their particular agenda.

That has happened to our people in Greater Anglosphere. The elites and their various front-groups spend trillions on the biggest system of psychological conditioning the world has ever seen, and it was targeted toward White children in an attempt to completely alter how we see and think about our own race. Thus, when these very same elites and their front-groups implement policies and programs which are completely at odds with Caucasians we aren't able as a group to effectively oppose them at any substantial level. Some of us are more brainwashed than other. I mean you have young and older White people calling for the end of the White race, and doing publicly and proudly. These types of people are totally gone. Then there are people with less anti-White sentiment, but who still have a number of anti-White notions and precepts that inform their socioeconomic and political discourse.

The reason I bring up this issue of brainwashing and how it has been perpetrated upon the children of my race, the White race, is because as we come out of the racial demoralization that has been imposed on us White people from birth, we still have to recognize that we still may have vestiges of the anti-White mental programming that we received growing up. In the of this argument about Canada or America becoming North American versions of Brazil, we have some questions to ask in regard to why we would even accept such a proposal.

Why do we have to transform into another Brazil, racially? Why is that. Who says that Canada, a country that was 98% White in 1965 had to open its doors to non-White immigration so that the White population would decrease in percentage to a racial minority? The fact of the matter is PaxCanadiana that we do not have to become a non-White nation. We have been violated by a very hateful cabal of elites that are thoroughly anti-White. They say that are anti-racist, in reality what they are is ANTI-WHITE. I mean anybody that says that Canada or America should let in non-White peoples thus making the founding White people a minority is no friend of White people, that is obvious. They are the ones saying that we need to be more like Brazil racially, and it is they that have implemented this psychological conditioning program to destroy Caucasians people's self regard and racial self esteem.

They know what they have done and they also know that they have failed to accomplish their New World Order, which essentially meant the eradication of the White race. They are over a barrel right now and we are coming out of our demoralization very very quickly and they are getting very frightened because we have caught them red-handed at this attermpted White Gencoide through forced non-immigration, integration, and racial assimilation.

I have much more to say but I'll leave at that for now.

Check out: www.whiterabbitradio.net

PaxCanadiana said...

What are the benefits of this controlled immigration that we couldn't achieve by being left alone?

One example that quickly comes to mind is the modern U.S. aerospace program. This was built with a significant contribution by immigrants selected for their specific knowledge.

In Canada we have Magna international and Roots clothing, two companies founded by immigrants.

What is bothersome is that these two examples can be used to justify limitless immigration as if all immigrants are the same. This is not true at all and a horde of under performing immigrants can erase any gains made by immigrants who do contribute something.

When I say it originated with and anti-White mindset and sentiment, I'm not talking about a non-White origin here; I'm talking about White anglo-elites trying to literally destroy their own founding gene pool.

I don't understand the motive for doing so. Why would they want that? What do they have to gain?

There have been social re-engineering projects, like feminism for instance, that have had a negative impact on the birth rate but I don't think white genocide was the driving impulse.

There are economic factors to consider. It's expensive to live here and immigrants feel the pressure as well. That's why immigrant women along with their Canadian born children experience birth rates on par with the rest of the Canadian populace and this holds true for most of the western world. One group that does buck the trend is Muslims.

If the government was serious about population growth it would address this instead of turning to an inefficient, costly, under performing immigration option.

Anonymous said...

"Indeed, some parts of the U.S. look like parts of the third world already."


Indeed, although there are some deeply impoverished parts which are quintessentially American. I've yet to see a "third-world" trailer park...

Anonymous said...

Also, ethanol fuel originated from Brazil...

whitejustice said...

“This is a decade where we are finding out that the growth of the Hispanic population is really necessary to keep the population vibrant,” said the study’s author, Brookings Institution demographer William Frey."

Can any anti-white here can deny that is naked race-replacement(genocide)advocacy?

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

Sheamus said...

Why do you want to force white children to live as an ethnic minority in their own countries?

Chinese children have China.
African children have Africa.
White children are having their homes given away.
It’s genocide.
Why do you support genocide?

Do you think it will be fun for white children born today to live as ethnic minorities in their own lands? What have they done to you to deserve this?

Why do you want to replace white children in their own countries?

Anonymous said...

Genocide Complaint Filed Against Canada

Read the Document
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49580274/genocide-complaint

Anonymous said...

I don't understand the motive for doing so. Why would they want that? What do they have to gain?

We can sit here and argue about what they gain from it and why they are doing it, but all this does is distract us from the fact that it is being done.

If someone steals your credit card do you rack your brains trying to wonder why they stole it?

Taken from the United Nations website (http://www.un.org/millennium/law/iv-1.htm):

The Convention defines genocide as any of a number of acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group, and forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Japan is a nation with a 1st world standard of living, an aging population, and a low birth-rate, but nobody is demanding that Japan brings in millions of third-world immigrants.

Japan is 98.5% Japanese.

Yet people demand that all White countries (that includes USA, Canada, and Australia) accept non-White immigration into all of their coutries.

USA is 77% White, Britain is 92% White. The Whites in USA, Canada, Britain, France, Holland, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, and Sweden are all projected to become minorities in their repective countries by the year 2050, according to UN figures. The whites in South Africa are on genocide watch (Google "Boer Genocide").

What's the difference between Japan and the above countries? Well, Japanese are Asian, and you don't get rid of White folk by mixing Asians with Indians, Africans, Muslims, etc.

Mass immigration and assimilation only being forced on all White countries and only White countries. It only endangers White folk; Africans have Africa, Asians have Asia, Indians have India, but all White countries are for everyone. It's genocide.v

PaxCanadiana said...

If anyone is perpetrating a white genocide it is whites themselves by refusing to procreate. It's that simple. If you are going to blame anyone for the eradication of the white race then blame whites. It'll be their fault and no one else's.

I see nurturing Canada's white majority demographic as a socially stabilizing force and it keeps the nation united. This isn't a guarantee of course since Quebec separatism and the U.S. civil war begs to differ. But a white French speaking Quebecer has more in common with a white English speaking Albertan than with a Mandarin speaking British Columbian.

My prediction is that Canada will be further divided by race once it becomes apparent that no one race is the clear national majority. Out of this confusion, some will jockey for economic and political supremacy and immigration will at last become a hotly debated and controversial topic. Ultimately Canada will fracture and cease to exist.

Whites will not be eradicated as a race in this future scenario but will form a majority somewhere on a territory that was once called Canada. I wonder if this will be accomplished peacefully or by bloodshed since no one will want to rule a smaller dominion.

As doomsday as this sounds I think this is a possible outcome given human nature. It may prove not to happen but I don't think it's worth the risk to find out. Better to stick with what works.

And that petition, I think, will only accomplish an RCMP phone tap if anything but it's your choice.

Anonymous said...

PaxCanadiana:

"I Don't understand the motive for doing so. Why would they want that? What do they have to gain?"

I understand your confusion about why our own elites would want to do something so incredibly bizarre. Many of us coming upon this realization for the first time experience the very same disbelief. The motive? Appearently it is part of the deal that they have made so that they may keep eternal power. Appearently we are very much ungovernable in their estimation and must be force-assimilated out of existence. There are other less important reasons, but that--I have been told--is the main one.

But I agree, it is very unnatural for an elite to try and destroy it's own founding gene pool. As far as we know, it has never been tried before. It is horribly unnatural. Has it worked?? No, it hasn't. They have failed to blend us out of existence. How do we know? We are still having this conversation. But they did try, especially post WW2 with big bold moves and trillions of dollars of social engineering systematically targeted toward White children. We have survived, but we have much work to do. The biggest thing that you and your compatriots can do is to get on a consistent message to each other and all of the people that you know about this White Genocide. To start please listen to the following MP3s:

www.whiterabbitradio.net

These will explain it all.

Thanks for your ideas

PaxCanadiana said...

I understand your confusion about why our own elites would want to do something so incredibly bizarre. Many of us coming upon this realization for the first time experience the very same disbelief. The motive? Appearently it is part of the deal that they have made so that they may keep eternal power. Appearently we are very much ungovernable in their estimation and must be force-assimilated out of existence. There are other less important reasons, but that--I have been told--is the main one.

I think it is better understood as the elitist-leftist-progressive version of "the white man's burden" in that they think that they can civilize the "immigrant savages" by bringing them to the west while enlightening the ignorant, dirty masses that is the host society with immigrant cultures and with elite wisdom.

It is also an effective weapon to attack conservative culture which they perceive to be evil. But white genocide is stretching it.

Where they falter is that they fail to fully appreciate the possible long term consequences of their decisions and whether they are viable at all; and you can't argue with them either since their self rightousness and moral exhibitionism shelters them from criticism. That's why accusations of racism is the first thing that comes out of their mouths.

I understand your arguments but you can't persuade me to them as much as I can dissuade you from them. In all honesty I find them outrageous.

Anonymous said...

"I understand your arguments but you can't persuade me to them as much as I can dissuade you from them. In all honesty I find them outrageous."

Well, no you can't dissuade me from my position. You have to understand that I too had your very same position years ago, until I finally came across some vital information. Regardless, we are not that far apart Pax because I think you really do want to do something about the pathetic levels of immigration that has been forcibly imposed upon our White people.

But try and remember, the concept of genocide does not ONLY necessarily mean a quick massive violent killing off of a people. There are other well-known methods of destroying a particular population without resorting to massive killings. One of the most common methods is force-blending a populaiton with another racially dissimilar population. That is what we are alleging our own elites are guilty of. And they know that they are guilty of it.

Let me ask you something here Pax. If you had on record a set of powerful elites saying that they wanted to blend out of existence a certain population by leading into its country massive numbers of racially dissimilar immigrants, and then proceeded to actually attempt to do so, would you then agree that they were guilty of genocide, or at least an attempted genocide??

The fact is Pax, we have the top elites of Greater Anglosphere on record saying that they wanted to accomplish exactly this. We have them on thousands upon thousands of records explaining their exact genocidal intentions in regard to their White populations. There are whole warehouses in places like Russia which house all of this evidence.

The fact is that we White people are finally coming out of our state-imposes demoralization and we are coming to a collective realization that we have been victimized in a most hideous fashion, and the anglo-elites are very very worried because they know what they did, and they know that more and more of us are finding out about it.

www.whiterabbitradio.net

PaxCanadiana said...

If you had on record a set of powerful elites saying that they wanted to blend out of existence a certain population by leading into its country massive numbers of racially dissimilar immigrants, and then proceeded to actually attempt to do so, would you then agree that they were guilty of genocide, or at least an attempted genocide??

The fact is Pax, we have the top elites of Greater Anglosphere on record saying that they wanted to accomplish exactly this. We have them on thousands upon thousands of records explaining their exact genocidal intentions in regard to their White populations. There are whole warehouses in places like Russia which house all of this evidence.


For the sake of argument I'll concede on this point. But this raises questions such as what's their motive? What do they have to gain by doing so? Power or money or unimaginable wealth?

Your position also implies a conspiracy. Do these elites meet regularly to plot the extinction of their own race? Frankly it all sounds absurd to me.

Anonymous said...

I don't doubt that the leaders of a nation want its inhabitants to mate and procreate together, minimizing tensions, whether that be Catholics-Protestants, or whites-minorities. Nicolas Sarkozy has said on record that interracial marriage is good for France recently. Is that the kind of "on record conspiracy" you mean?

Anonymous said...

PaxCanadian:

What is their motive?? I touched on that in an earlier post here.

1) They do not see themselves as part of our race. They actually see themselves literally as a seperate race of people, far superior to us 'regular' white people. THey have been interbreeding for a very long time and there may be something to that. They have not been breeding with on-the-street White people.

2) They see us as horribly difficult to govern. THere is indeed something to this as well. Whenever we have been oppressed by tyrannical peoples or leaders we have always found ways to overthrow them and reestablish our natural freedoms.

3) They believe that if they make all races meld into one coffee colored race, we will all lose out racial and ethnic affiliations and loyalties and will be therefore far easier to govern and rule over, that is, tyrannize...forever. They actually believe this. Thus, they are always trying to destroy or hinder the expression of tribal, racial, and cultural particularisms.

Do they have meetings to discuss this agenda?? Absolutely, I have been told that there are whole warehouses in places like Russia and other countries that house nothing but the intelligence evidence of those at the top of Anglosphere discussing the particulars of this agenda. I have been told this by people who know this with absolute certainty.

Now, I did ask the obvious question: If our side has this evidence against the Anglo-elites, then why don't they publish it so that we can make use of it. I was told that because most White people in Anglosphere are still so demoralized they wouldn't be able to make use of it...YET. I was told that in time it will be used in genocide tribunals. What you have to realize is that demoralized people cannot use real information, simply because of their psychological conditioning.

OUr job is to get on a consistent messasge to our compatriots, and keep it within the law. That is what we specialize in, and that is how we will bring our people out of the is horrible racial demorialization that has been perpetrated upon them as innocent little children.

You all need to listen to the 65 free MP3s at
www.whiterabbitradio.net

They explain it all, and they give you the vital skills to destroy this anti-White regime while staying within the law. That's right, you can give a pro-White message legally, but you have to learn how to do so. That's what you will learn from the MP3s. They are vital learning for all of us oppressed White people.

I hope this helps Pax...Keep up the great work

Anonymous said...

"I don't doubt that the leaders of a nation want its inhabitants to mate and procreate together, minimizing tensions, whether that be Catholics-Protestants, or whites-minorities. Nicolas Sarkozy has said on record that interracial marriage is good for France recently. Is that the kind of "on record conspiracy" you mean?"

Yes, he is definitely part of this whole anti-White agenda that has been perpetrated upon White children. It is interesting to note that he is NOT and indigenous French person. He comes from a totally different tribe of people. In other words, he is non-Caucasian. He is on record as saying that racial intermarriage in France is the desired policy and if the indigenous French people do do so voluntarily, more forceful methods will have to be employed to accomplish this goal. That is a public admission of the goal of White genocide in France at least, and he will definitely be brought into a genocide tribunal at some point in the future.

France is still under the thumb of the vile anglo-elites and this anti-White agenda.

But we are in the belly of the beast and the only way that we are going to get out of this is if we White dissidents get on a consistent message to each other, and do so within the laws, more specifically, the speech laws in our respective countries.

You all need to listen to the MP3s and Follow the White Rabbit radio.

www.whiterabbitradio.net

It's all explained there. We can't move forward until you guys learn this stuff.

Anonymous said...

We are white people can start banning banks and businesses that are anti-white, pro-diversity. I already starting doing this in canada this christmas. I googled all the stores that hate christmas which means they hate whites and I will no longer shop there nor will my friends or family. Another step is stop voting Liberal, but if you vote Conservative we have to stop the government from bringing in 300,000 temporary foreign workers a year to steal jobs away from our local people (which is why our youth unemployment is now 35% and kids are staying in school and indebting their hardworking white parents).