Sunday, 10 April 2011

Why Are We Importing People Who Need Further Skills Upgrading In The First Place?

It's the obvious question the media never bothers to ask.

It's election time again and that means the obligatory pandering to key block votes. In this case it's every party's favourite, the immigrant/ethnic block vote.

So apparently still, to this day, we are introducing immigrant cohorts into Canada's labour market ill-equipped to get a running start. It's been a problem for quite a while now and it looks like, finally, they're going to do something about it, fingers crossed.

The underemployed/unemployed skilled-immigrant-driving-a-cab phenomenon has provided many a journalist an opportunity to engage in moral exhibitionism while pretending to look like they care.

Yet time after time they fail to ask the most obvious question which is the one I ask in the post title, a question immigration reformers have asked before and will continue to ask for years to come but a question no one seems to be able to answer.

If immigrants need further skills training, tax payer subsidized of course, upon arrival in Canada then it says a lot about the effectiveness of the points system doesn't it? It also illustrates the inefficiency of the immigration system. If they need further skills training then obviously we are bringing in the wrong types of immigrants. If their skills are outdated then they shouldn't be coming here. If the skills they offer are in surplus then that's the fault of the immigration system and they still shouldn't have come here. If they are to be retrained for a job they were not imported to fill well there are plenty of unemployed and underemployed Canadians who can be trained for that job.

As for credential recognition ask yourself this: will you go to a doctor educated at an Indian university? I rest my case. I acknowledge that there are immigrants with credentials from western education systems. But the hurdles they face are set before them by Canada's professional colleges and organizations as a way to protect themselves from the negative economic impacts of mass immigration that the rest of us have to put up with. It's mostly out of professional courtesy and class loyalty that the political classes are not pressure them to get immigrants credentials recognized and get them working.


Anonymous said...

And in respect to the credential issue and the ability of the politicians and professional associations to maintain entry barriers to protect themselves from the foreign competition, you should all recognize some very basic facts here.

First, the third world is being led into Canada by our own elites, and it doesn't look like they want to reverse their open border policy that is ethnically cleansing our cities and towns of White people.

Second, they will become powerful enough politically to affect policies regarding the professional acceptance of their credentials, thus, allowing them to practice their professions upon our people.

Finally, the professional standards which are similar in all countries which are essentially White, will deteriorate drastically as they have in all non-White third world areas of the globe.

By the time that that happens, I hope to have my White gene pool migrated to other pro-White countries where their elites are not so unbelievably maniacally anti-White.

Anonymous said...

Wow, this guy actually believes there are no second- or third-world white-majority nations. LOL!! Must be fun residing in La La Land.

Anonymous said...

Can you name one please??

Anonymous said...

Sure, Anon:) Hungary, Romania, Moldova, Albania, Russia, Lithuania, Macedonia, need I go on?

Anonymous said...

Where is my comment? I named several...

PaxCanadiana said...

Where is my comment? I named several...

I moderate the comments so they don't get published until I clear them.

I don't get around to doing it as often as I should so it may be some time before you see the comment posted.

Anonymous said...

I have to respectfully disagree with you about those countries. They do not fit my definition of second or third world countries, that's for sure.

Wait a second here though. Are you absolutely sure that you aren't just another ANTI-WHITE that has it in for my race?? The countries that you have mentioned have snipped the balls off of the New World Order that the anglo-elites tried to impose on the whole world for goodness sakes, especially Russia. Their are not second or third world nation.

But this misses the point here. There has been a concerted attempt to force-blend the indigenous White children of Europe right out of existence; that program was formulated, financed, orchistrated, and financed by the White anglo-elites at the top of anglosphere. Fortunately it has failed so far, but we have some work to do to rectify what they have done to my race...That's where the genocide tribunals come it. Stick around, it's going to be very interesting.

Anonymous said...

Really there is only one question here:

Are you pro-White, or, are you pro White genocide??

If you believe that my race should be allowed to have it's own homeland--like every other race--so that we are allowed to live exclusively amongst other White people and secure a future for White children, then you are PRO-WHITE.

If on the other hand you believe that we should not be allowed to achieve this outcome, then you are pro White-Genocide. That's all there is to it.

Anonymous said...

@Anonymous the conspiracy theorist - I understand that you think there is a conspiracy to rid the world of white people. I find this to be nonsense of the highest order. The challenges facing Canada are not unique to what you deem "the angloshere," nor are they present in all "white" countries (have you take a look at Polish demographics lately?) Secondly, I got those names directly from the list of developing (that is to say, second- as well as third-world) countries ranked by the UN according to HDI. To put it bluntly, there are only a handful of countries, maybe ten give or take, in this world that are even worth a s**t to live in as far as high quality of life/development goes. Furthermore, no matter what you say, myself and the vast majority of rational people will ALWAYS deem "genocide" to mean the killing of a large group of people based on their physical characteristics. If you can show me where a group of white people anywhere on the planet in recent history have been rounded up and brought to their certain death in the style of a concentration camp, I will most certainly agree with you and express outrage at this gross injustice. And finally, my entire family is of mixed ethnic origin, so fittingly I am for objective discussion and true democracy. If immigration is a point of concern for the citizens of a nation, let them vote on it and have a say. So I guess that would make me pro-white genocide, according to your logic (snickers.)

PaxCanadiana said...

If you can show me where a group of white people anywhere on the planet in recent history have been rounded up and brought to their certain death in the style of a concentration camp, I will most certainly agree with you and express outrage at this gross injustice.

Zimbabwe perhaps?

Skuli Jakobsson said...

Definition of Genocide:
Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.

Then there is the program:

Forced immigration into all white countries and only white countries (anywhere else is labeled genocide)
forced integration into all white countries and only white countries (anywhere else is labeled genocide)
then they push interracial relationships in white countries and only white countries .......hmmmmm....there is a pattern emerging here
then they promote a Brown future for ALL White Countries...hmmmm
.......SURE is difficult to see how the word Genocide applies here

For the newest example Google:
Obama administration: California’s whitest county MUST BE FORCIBLY INTEGRATED.

Anti-racism is just a codeword for anti-White.

Anonymous said...

Well said Mr. Skull Jakkobson, I couldn't have said it any better myself. What's most important about your post is that you have quoted the very man Raphael Lemkhin who actually coined the term Genocide in the first place. He understood very well that genocide takes various forms very often different than simply an aploplective violent event. Everything that you described in your post has clearly been perpetrated upon innocent White children certainly in Greater Anglosphere.

To be totally fair to the poster above who disputed the very clear attempt to genocide White people through programs of forced immigration, integration, and ultimately racial assimilation of White children with non-White people, thus, destroying our particular genotype. That is GENOCIDE. Most people just don't understand this...Yet. But they will. There really isn't any discussion at this point about whether or not there is an official program of White Genocide. That has already been decided.

Anonymous said...

to the idiot whim censor
the only peace you have (PaxCanadiana) is that you are a piece of canadian assholery.

Anonymous said...

"There are none so blind as those who will not see".

Or, in other words, you cannot make someone pay attention to something that he or she does not want to notice.

Although this website relates to the ongoing White genocide in Europe, we Canadians with eyes wide open, can see the same trends happening here.

....and for the above poster who suggests there's no evidence of white genocide of the murdering kind, try explaining that to multitude of white South African farm families who've been suffering this fate since 1994.

If you're a MSM reader/listener, I can understand you not being informed of these blatant atrocities happening on average, twice weekly.

Anonymous said...

Still censoring information you don't agree with I see. No wonder your comment section doesn't amount to anything of interest. It's as boring as your county
to: paxcanadiansassholery

PaxCanadiana said...

Still censoring information you don't agree with I see.


No wonder your comment section doesn't amount to anything of interest. It's as boring as your county

You mean immigration has failed to make Canada a culturally vibrant and therefore interesting to place to live? I agree so let's drop the pretensions and stop using immigration as a program of forced diversity for diversity's sake and gear it to meet the real needs of Canadians while reflecting their concerns. Like seriously, who ever thought Canadians would ever give two damns and a half about Chinese or Punjai or Somali or Muslim or Filipino or Hindu culture?

In any case I'll assume you arrived at that conclusion based on experience so if you happen to be currently residing in Canada I invite you to leave the country for fun and adventure abroad. And upon doing so I invite you to revoke your Canadian citizenship and never return to Canada again. There's the challenge to you but were I a gambler the smart money says you won't do it at least not going to far as to surrender your citizenship. Says a lot about you doesn't it?

Anonymous said...

All right, maybe I was a little bit over the top in my comments, but I was annoyed that my post about the difference between 3rd and 2nd world countries was not posted. My apologies to you for my bad manners.